Trial Lawyers · Criminal Defense · Technology Litigation · New York · New Jersey · California

Where courtroom skill meets tech expertise.

“A rare skill for those in the legal profession.”
TechCrunch

Our expertise lets us uncover the facts and present them compellingly — in motions, at trial, and if necessary, on appeal.

Practice Areas

From the first meeting, we focus on how our combination of technical expertise and courtroom skill can achieve the best possible outcome, at every stage from pre-suit negotiations and motion practice through trial.

Built for modern litigation.

We are committed to the cutting-edge and ethical use of artificial intelligence, in accordance with the highest ethical standards. By leveraging technology, our focused team can often move faster and more cost-effectively than much larger firms. Mr. Horowitz has lectured on cybersecurity ethics, including the ethical use of AI.

Dismissals & Acquittals

In state and federal criminal matters

Non-Jail Sentences

For clients facing years in federal prison

Appellate Wins

Reversals in the First and Second Departments

Financial Recoveries

For clients harmed by the wrongdoing of others

Trials & Landmark Matters

Selected
U.S. District Court · Middle District of Florida

Estados Unidos contra Noor Salman

Acquitted on all counts

Charged with aiding and abetting the Pulse Nightclub shooting. As the defense's cyber forensics expert, Mr. Horowitz distilled several terabytes of device data and server logs into a clear presentation demonstrating that no device seized by the government had accessed the Pulse Nightclub web server.

“The rarest of defeats” for federal prosecutors.The New York Times
Court of Common Pleas · Philadelphia

Commonwealth v. I-Dean F.

Acquitted on all counts, including third-degree murder

Retained as co-counsel to focus on cell phone forensic and call detail record data at the heart of the prosecution's case. Mr. Horowitz's cross-examination showed that the police had failed to follow basic forensic principles, forcing a prosecution expert to concede that key evidence had been altered.

“The contents of the [text message database file] was modified sometime after the cell phone was taken into police custody.”Prosecution expert, on cross-examination
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York

Estados Unidos contra Ulbricht (Silk Road)

A case of first impression

Retained as co-counsel to analyze terabytes of forensic data from servers worldwide. His 18-page declaration challenged the FBI's account of how it located the Silk Road server in an Icelandic data center and withstood scrutiny from computer experts around the world.

Read the Horowitz Declaration

Resultados recientes

All results
Apr 2025Mandatory-minimum sentence against Guidelines of 100–125 monthsUnited States v. K.A. · E.D.N.Y. · Narcotics conspiracy›
After a contested bail fight, secured the client's release following nearly 18 months in custody, then persuaded the Court to impose the least possible prison time over the government's request for 108 months.
“I will follow your excellent counsel's recommendation and sentence you to [the minimum].”
Mar 2025Time-served sentence against Guidelines of 37–46 monthsUnited States v. S.D. · E.D.N.Y. · Narcotics conspiracy›
The client was initially charged with an offense carrying a ten-year mandatory minimum. Mr. Horowitz secured release on bail despite significant issues, giving the client the opportunity to become sober and rebuild their life.
Feb 2025Probation in a multi-million-dollar wire fraud caseUnited States v. A.H. · S.D.N.Y. · Wire fraud conspiracy›
The client was initially charged with multiple counts of aggravated identity theft, each carrying a mandatory two years. A compelling sentencing memorandum showed the extenuating circumstances behind the conduct.
Feb 2025No prison time where the government sought 51–63 monthsUnited States v. D.S. · S.D.N.Y. · Civil rights conspiracy›
Working with co-counsel, persuaded the Court that the defense “got it right,” and that a Guidelines sentence would have been “just beyond preposterous.”
Jan 2023Felony vehicular assault charges resolved as a traffic infractionPeople v. S. · New York County Supreme Court›
Prosecutors initially recommended 1.5 to 4 years in state prison. Through investigation, motion practice, and expert witnesses, Mr. Horowitz showed that the prosecution's toxicology theory was deeply flawed, and the case was resolved as the legal equivalent of a speeding ticket, preserving the client's life and career.
Oct 2022Reversal on appeal and dismissal of Internet defamation claimsDericco v. M. · Appellate Division, First Department›
Identified the lower court's misapplication of First Amendment principles to Internet speech and persuaded the First Department to reverse and dismiss all of the plaintiffs' claims.
2021Reversal of summary judgment, then a favorable resolution at trialTrade secrets & non-competition · Appellate Division, Second Department›
Obtained reversal of the trial court's summary judgment order on appeal, then secured a favorable resolution at trial before the close of evidence.

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Principal

Joshua J. Horowitz

Mr. Horowitz has achieved extraordinary results in some of the most complex and difficult matters, owing to his legal acumen, courtroom skill, and litigation strategy. He is a member of the Criminal Justice Act panels for the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York, where he represents individuals charged with racketeering, money laundering, international narcotics trafficking, fraud, and other federal crimes. He was named a Top 40 Under 40 criminal defense lawyer by The National Trial Lawyers in 2023, 2024, and 2025.

He has also been qualified as an expert in cybersecurity and computer forensics in state and federal courts throughout the country, and has litigated some of the most technologically complex cases of the modern era. He also lectures on cybersecurity ethics, including the ethical use of AI.

He is admitted to practice in New York, New Jersey, and California.

Full biography

Schedule a confidential consultation.

Contact the firm
Telephone
(212) 203-9011
Correo electrónico
info@techlawny.com
Encrypted
PGP key available