We partner with other attorneys on matters where technical evidence or a complex trial calls for additional depth, as co-counsel or as consulting experts, while you remain the client's primary counsel.
We join trial teams to handle technical witnesses, cross-examine the government's or an opponent's forensic experts, and present electronic evidence clearly to the jury.
Suppression motions, Daubert and Frye challenges, and other motions that turn on how electronic evidence was collected, preserved, and interpreted.
Early review of discovery, including phone extractions, cloud records, location data, and server logs, to identify the issues and shape the strategy.
Briefing on issues involving technical evidence, in direct appeals and post-conviction proceedings.
Forensic analysis of electronic evidence and help preparing to cross-examine opposing experts. Where a matter calls for it, Mr. Horowitz is also available to testify as an expert in computer and cell phone forensics.
Retained as co-counsel to analyze terabytes of forensic data. His declaration challenged the FBI's account of how it located the Silk Road server.
Retained as co-counsel to focus on cell phone forensics and call detail records. The jury acquitted on all counts, including third-degree murder.
Together with co-counsel, obtained a non-jail sentence where the government sought 51 to 63 months' imprisonment.
Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
Argues that evidence from a GrayKey extraction, Cellebrite analysis, and Telegram messages recovered from iOS notification databases requires expert testimony under Rule 702, and seeks a Daubert hearing on the reliability of GrayKey.
Declaration challenging the FBI's account of how it located the Silk Road server in an Icelandic data center, based on review of terabytes of server and forensic data.
Client names and identifying details have been redacted.
If you have a case where we may be able to help, we are happy to talk through it and find an arrangement that fits the matter.
Contact the firm